Cases 1 - 10 of 100
Kitts v. Spring Oak Senior Living
as 0:2026cv02848
Plaintiff:
Tyrell Lee Kitts
Defendant:
Spring Oak Senior Living
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
Martin et al v. City Of Oakland et al
as 3:2026cv06284
Plaintiff:
Leslie Martin and Douglas Martin
Defendant:
City Of Oakland, Riryon Machado, Justin Bermudez and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Deva v. Logansport City of et al
as 3:2026cv00805
Plaintiff:
Abhaya Nand Deva
Defendant:
Logansport City of, Kelly Leeman, Bradley A Rozzi and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Kitts v. USA
as 3:2026cv00268
Petitioner:
Roscoe J Kitts
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Webb v. Kitt et al
as 1:2026cv01409
Plaintiff:
Keaire Webb
Defendant:
Demond Kitt, Charles Wesley, A. Pitre and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Kitts v. Ori, Inc.
as 1:2026cv11410
Plaintiff:
Brian Kitts
Defendant:
Ori, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 501 Copyright Infringement
Kitts v. Social Security Administration, Commissioner of
as 3:2025cv00606
Plaintiff:
Richard Kitts
Defendant:
Social Security Administration, Commissioner of
Interested Party:
SSA Office of the General Counsel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Artis v. Rhinehart et al
as 1:2025cv01103
Plaintiff:
Stewart M Artis, Sr.
Defendant:
John Rhinehart, Jay K. Nair, Emeterio Rudolfo and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
KITT v. PENN-ALLEGHENY PERSONAL CARE HOME, LLC
as 2:2025cv01691
Plaintiff:
TAMMIE KITT
Defendant:
PENN-ALLEGHENY PERSONAL CARE HOME, LLC doing business as CORNERVIEW NURSING AND REHABILITATION FACILITY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
Carlisle v. Caban et al
as 1:2025cv09028
Plaintiff:
Antwane Carlisle
Defendant:
Osvaldo Caban, PO Savannah Kitt, PO Morillo and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
