Cases 21 - 30 of 468
KAUFFMAN v. SMITH et al
as 3:2023cv00239
Plaintiff:
DAVID R. KAUFFMAN
Defendant:
BARRY SMITH, ERIC YOUNG, BORDAS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Walker v. Harris et al
as 2:2023cv12328
Plaintiff:
Freddreka Walker
Defendant:
Deanna Harris, Mary M. Coyle, Karen Thomas and others
Scott Kline v. M. Monsalud
as 23-12926
Plaintiff / Appellant:
SCOTT ALAN KLINE
Defendant / Appellee:
M. MONSALUD, DR/CHO
Fisher (PS) v. Stancil et al
as 1:2023cv02030
Plaintiff:
Jeremy Fisher
Defendant:
Moses Andre Stancil, Leonard Woodson, III, Amanda Retting and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Clem v. Hamilton et al
as 7:2023cv00487
Plaintiff:
Jason Clem
Defendant:
Israel Hamilton, Bernard Morris, Lyons Sanchezconcha and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Phoebus Apollo v. Tracy Beltz, et al
as 23-2659
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Phoebus P. Apollo, also known as Archbishop Kingpimp Shortymacnifisent
Defendant / Appellee:
Tracy Beltz, Chad Mitsch, Bao Nyguyen and others
Martinez et al v. Stancil et al
as 1:2023cv01782
Plaintiff:
Matthew Joseph Martinez and Stephen Eric Peacock
Defendant:
Moses Stancil, Michelle Brodeur, Kimberly Kline and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
KLINE v. HACKER et al
as 1:2023cv01171
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL W. KLINE
Defendant:
M. HACKER, K. SMITH, M. PAGE and others
Debtor In Possession:
J. NWANNUNU
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Cage v. Beard et al
as 2:2023cv11575
Defendant:
Jerome Waefield, Curtis Beard, Jill Kline and others
Plaintiff:
Landis Cage
Godel et al v. Stancil et al
as 1:2023cv01567
Plaintiff:
David R. Godel and William J. Lomax
Defendant:
Moses Andre Stancil, James Bailey, Shannon Folz and others
Interested Party:
CASE MANAGER FOR David R. Godel and CASE MANAGER FOR William J. Lomax
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
