Cases 1 - 10 of 512
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00863
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 8 U.S.C. § 1446 Petition for Naturalization Hearing
Klinger v. Lowes Home Centers LLC
as 2:2024cv00150
Plaintiff:
Karl Klinger
Defendant:
Lowes Home Centers LLC A North Carolina Limited Liability Company, registered to do business in Washington doing business as Lowes Home Centers LLC #152 and John Does I-III
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Personal Injury
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 24-1083
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00930
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Race)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv10490
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv10235
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Alford Jr v. Wall et al
as 1:2024cv00081
Plaintiff:
Larry D. Alford Jr
Defendant:
John Wall, John Hellman, John Crace and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Cullen v. Wall et al
as 1:2024cv00048
Plaintiff:
Fathi Mushapha Cullen and Larry D. Alford Jr
Defendant:
John Wall, John Hellman, John Crace and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Perkins v. Wapinsky et al
as 1:2023cv02126
Plaintiff:
Hakeim Perkins
Defendant:
Warden David Wapinsky, Deputy Warden Buchanan, Captain Bowman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Paul v. Wapinsky et al
as 1:2023cv02125
Plaintiff:
Frank Paul
Defendant:
David Wapinsky, Deputy Warden Buchanan, Captain Bowman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
