Cases 1 - 10 of 37
Rutledge v. Roosevelt County Jail et al
as 4:2022cv00112
Plaintiff:
Richard L Rutledge
Defendant:
Roosevelt County Jail, Debra Collins, Roosevelt County and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Rutledge v. Guess et al
as 0:2022cv02645
Plaintiff:
Montez Rutledge, Montez and Montez L. Rutledge
Defendant:
Travis L. Guess, Allen Rodgers, Lt. Travis L. Guess and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights, State Filers
Rutledge v. Warden of Georgetown County Detention Center
as 5:2022cv01645
Petitioner:
Corey L Rutledge
Respondent:
State Of SC and Warden of Georgetown County Detention Center
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
RUTLEDGE v. KIJAKAZI
as 1:2022cv00938
Plaintiff:
SHARON L. RUTLEDGE
Defendant:
KILOLO KIJAKAZI
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Dylan Brandt, et al v. Leslie Rutledge, et al
as 21-2875
Plaintiff / Appellee:
Dylan Brandt, by and through his mother Joanna Brandt, Joanna Brandt, Sabrina Jennen, by and through her parents Lacey and Aaron Jennen and others
Defendant / Appellant:
Leslie Rutledge, in her official capacity as the Arkansas Attorney General, Amy E. Embry, in her official capacity as the Executive Director of the Arkansas State Medical Board, Sylvia D. Simon, in official capacity as member of the Arkansas State Medical Board and others
Little Rock Fam Planning Svcs, et al v. Larry Jegley, et al
as 21-2857
Plaintiff / Appellee:
Little Rock Family Planning Services, on behalf of itself and its patients, Planned Parenthood of Arkansas & Eastern Oklahoma, on behalf of itself and its patients, doing business as Planned Parenthood Great Plains and Janet R. Cathey, M.D. on behalf of herself and her patients
Defendant / Appellant:
Larry Jegley, in his official capacity as Prosecuting Attorney of Pulaski County, Sylvia D. Simon, M.D. in her official capacity as Chairman of the Arkansas State Medical Board, Robert Breving, M.D., in his official capacity as officer/member of the Arkansas State Medical Board and others
Little Rock Family Planning Services et al v. Jegley et al
as 4:2021cv00453
Defendant:
Marsha Boss, William L Rutledge, Melissa Faulkenberry and others
Plaintiff:
Planned Parenthood of Arkansas & Eastern Oklahoma on behalf of itself and its patients doing business as Planned Parenthood Great Plains, Little Rock Family Planning Services and Janet Cathey
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
Brandt et al v. Rutledge et al
as 4:2021cv00450
Defendant:
Amy E Embry, William L Rutledge, Edward Gardner and others
Plaintiff:
Lacey Jennen, Dylan Brandt, Amanda Dennis and others
Amicus Curiae:
American Academy of Pediatrics, Academic Pediatric Association, American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
Frederick Hopkins, et al v. Larry Jegley, et al
as 21-1068
Defendant / Appellant:
Carl Riddell, M.D., Officer and member of the Arkansas Department of Health, Dwayne Daniels, M.D., Officer and member of the Arkansas Department of Health, Brian T. Hyatt, M.D., Officer and Member of the State Medical Board and others
Defendant:
Bob Cogburn, M.D., officer and member of the Arkansas State Medical Board, and successors in office, in his official capacity, John B. Weiss, M.D., officer and member of the Arkansas State Medical Board, and successors in office, in his official capacity, Steven L. Cathey, M.D., Chair of the Arkansas State Medical Board and others
Plaintiff / Appellee:
Little Rock Family Planning Services, Inc. and Frederick W. Hopkins, M.D., M.P.H.
Appellant:
State of Kentucky, State of Alabama, State of Arizona and others
Rutledge v. Manning et al
as 4:2020cv00100
Defendant:
Debra Collins, Roosevelt County Detention Center, Morty Manning and others
Plaintiff:
Richard L Rutledge and Chris Friede
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
