Cases 1 - 10 of 2,952
Indiana Public Retirement System v. Agilon Health, Inc. et al
as 1:2024cv00544
Plaintiff:
Indiana Public Retirement System
Defendant:
Agilon Health, Inc., Steven J. Sell, Timothy S. Bensley and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 77 Securities Fraud
Douglas et al v. Sell et al
as 1:2024cv00531
Plaintiff:
Dalton Douglas
Defendant:
Steven J. Sell, TIMOTHY S. BENSLEY, Glenn Sobotka and others
Mayfield v. City of College Station
as 24-20213
Plaintiff:
Helen Tyne Mayfield and James Campbell
Defendant:
City of College Station, City of Bryan, Brazos County and others
Holley v. Woolard et al
as 4:2024cv00050
Plaintiff:
Betsy S. Holley and John L. Smith
Defendant:
Elvanetta S. Woolard, Pamela Fleming, Taneisha W. Whitehurst and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Smith v. Reynolds
as 2:2024cv02368
Petitioner:
Gage L. Smith
Respondent:
Warden Stephen Reynolds
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Smith v. Reynolds
as 1:2024cv00517
Petitioner:
Gage L. Smith
Respondent:
Warden Stephen Reynolds
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Smith v. 3M Company et al
as 0:2024cv01711
Plaintiff:
Edward L. Smith
Defendant:
3M Company and Arizant Healthcare, Inc.
Smith v. New Direction, LLC
as 3:2024cv01222
Plaintiff:
Hallie L Smith
Defendant:
New Direction, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Wright v. Smith et al
as 6:2024cv00840
Plaintiff:
William Andre Wright
Defendant:
L. Smith, Vargas and Oviedo Police Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Joe Hand Promotions, Inc. v. The Spot Bar & Restaurant LLC et al
as 6:2024cv00120
Plaintiff:
Joe Hand Promotions, Inc.
Defendant:
The Spot Bar & Restaurant LLC d/b/a The Spot Bar & Restaurant and Shalonda L. Smith
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
