Cases 1 - 10 of 20
James Steurt v. L 3 Communications Corp
as 22-1847
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JAMES STEURT
Defendant / Appellee:
L 3 COMMUNICATIONS CORP
Randall v. L-3 Communication Corp et al
as 3:2017mc00012
Plaintiff:
Vera-Jean G Randall
Defendant:
L-3 Communication Corp, James Daniel Ivey and John De Monic, Jr
L-3 Communications Corp. et al v. Serco, Inc.
as 1:2017mc00026
Plaintiff:
L-3 Communications Corp. and L-3 Applied Technologies, Inc.
Defendant:
Serco Inc.
Cause Of Action: Motion to Compel
L-3 Communications Corp. et al v. Serco, Inc.
as 1:2017mc00168
Plaintiff:
L-3 Communications Corp. and L-3 Applied Technologies, Inc.
Defendant:
Serco, Inc.
Interested_party:
Jaxon Engineering & Maintenance, Inc.
Cause Of Action: Civil Miscellaneous Case
Baker v. L-3 Communications Corporation et al
as 3:2015cv03679
Plaintiff:
Charlize Marie Baker
Defendant:
L-3 Communications Corp and AETNA Life Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
L-3 Communications Corp. et al v. Serco, Inc.
as 1:2015mc00176
Plaintiff:
L-3 Communications Corp. and L-3 Applied Technologies, Inc
Defendant:
Serco, Inc.
L-3 Communications Corp. et al v. Serco, Inc.
as 1:2015mc00042
Plaintiff:
L-3 Communications Corp. and L-3 Applied Technologies, Inc.
Defendant:
Serco, Inc.
Miscellaneou:
Susan Rettig
Cause Of Action: Civil Miscellaneous Case
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2014cv05334
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Omar Nadheer v. Ins Company of the State of PA, et al
as 12-50164
Plaintiff - Appellant:
OMAR NADHEER
Defendant - Appellee:
INSURANCE COMPANY OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA, AMERICAN INTERNATIONAL GROUP INC and L-3 COMMUNICATIONS CORP
Condatis LLC v. A.P. Moller-Maersk A/S et al
as 6:2010cv00600
Plaintiff:
Condatis LLC
Defendant:
A.P. Moller-Maersk A/S, ABB, Inc., ABB, Ltd. and others
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
