Cases 1 - 10 of 170
Johnstone v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv01136
Plaintiff:
Johnstone L Dennis
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C.R.Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00097
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 0:2024cv00426
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal - Employment Discrim
Dennis v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2024cv00027
Plaintiff:
David Lee Dennis, Jr. and David L. Dennis, Jr.
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Not Yet Classified:
General Counsel SSA (Court use only)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (RSI)
DENNY v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 9:2023cv09174
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM L DENNY
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Matthew Dennis v. Lizzie Tegels
as 23-2087
Petitioner / Appellant:
MATTHEW L. DENNIS
Respondent / Appellee:
LIZZIE TEGELS, Warden
Telzy Dennis v. Nike, Inc.
as 23-55360
Plaintiff / Appellant:
TELZY L. DENNIS, an individual
Defendant / Appellee:
NIKE, INC., an Oregon corporation
Scott v. Burrell et al
as 1:2022cv01346
Plaintiff:
Joshua Orlando Scott
Defendant:
. Burrell, Christen, Jennifer Meaker and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Dennis v. Boulos et al
as 1:2022cv01025
Plaintiff:
Roger L. Dennis and Abdul a.m. Shakur
Defendant:
Dr. Tim Boulos, New Castle County Police Department and Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jerry McConnachie v. Eastern State Hospital, et al
as 22-35445
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JERRY D. MCCONNACHIE
Defendant / Appellee:
EASTERN STATE HOSPITAL, DOCTOR SIMANGAN DODDS, DOCTOR GREG BAHDER and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
