Cases 41 - 50 of 60
In Re: Julius Elliott, Jr., et al
as 11-1847
Defendant - Petitioner:
In re: JULIUS L. ELLIOTT, JR.
Defendant - Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
ELLIOTT v. GIORLA et al
as 2:2011cv01433
Plaintiff:
NATHANIEL L. ELLIOTT
Defendant:
LOUIS GIORLA and (PDOC)-PHILA. DEPART. OF CORRECTIONS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2011cv00109
Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 0158
Semedo v. Elliott et al
as 1:2010cv11976
Plaintiff:
Jose Semedo
Defendant:
Lon L. Elliott and City of Brockton
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
ELLIOTT v. A. L. BURBANK & COMPANY LTD.
as 2:2010cv50650
Plaintiff:
CHRIS L ELLIOTT
Defendant:
A. L. BURBANK & COMPANY LTD.
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 688
ELLIOTT v. FOSTER WHEELER ENERGY CORPORATION
as 2:2010cv50649
Plaintiff:
CHRIS L ELLIOTT
Defendant:
FOSTER WHEELER ENERGY CORPORATION
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 688
Justice v. Walline et al
as 2:2009cv00811
Plaintiff:
Lloyd A Justice
Defendant:
Michael C Walline, Jennifer Ruff, Scott Ruff and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Personal Injury
Jackie Elliott v. USA
as 09-5988
Petitioner - Appellant:
JACKIE L. ELLIOTT
Respondent - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
ELLIOTT et al v. CROWN CORK AND SEAL COMPANY et al
as 2:2009cv80127
Plaintiff:
RONALD L. ELLIOTT and JEAN ELLIOTT
Defendant:
CROWN CORK AND SEAL COMPANY, OWENS-CORNING FIBERGLAS CORPORATION, OWENS-CORNING FIBERGLAS CORPORATION and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
ELLIOTT et al v. OWENS-CORNING FIBERGLASS CORPORATION et al
as 2:2009cv75022
Plaintiff:
RICHARD A. ELLIOTT, RICHARD A. ELLIOTT, DONNA L. ELLIOTT and others
Defendant:
OWENS-CORNING FIBERGLASS CORPORATION, CELOTEX CORPORATION, FIBREBOARD CORP and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
