Cases 31 - 40 of 206
Guardado-Turcios v. Garland
as 22-6058
Petitioner:
A. E. L-G. and MARIA SEBASTIAN GUARDADO-TURCIOS
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, UNITED STATES ATTORNEY GENERAL
L. G. v. Sandhu
as 2:2021cv00641
Plaintiff:
L. G.
Defendant:
Ujjal Sandhu
Petitioner:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
M A O L G L L C v. Valley Forge Insurance Co et al
as 2:2021cv02989
Plaintiff:
MAOLG LLC and M A O L G L L C
Defendant:
Valley Forge Insurance Co and Continental Casualty Co
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2021cv01295
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Hector Garcia, et al v. City of McAllen, Texas, et al
as 20-40646
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Hector Hugo Garcia, Hector Hugo Garcia, as next friend L. L. G., a minor and Hector Hugo Garcia, on behalf of Estate of Ashley Karime Garcia
Defendant / Appellee:
City of McAllen, Texas and Michael Soto
L.G. v. Oklahoma Department of Corrections et al
as 6:2020cv00306
Defendant:
Rabekah Mooneyham, Board of Corrections, Penny Lewis and others
Plaintiff:
L. G.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
G v. Oklahoma Department of Corrections et al
as 5:2020cv00893
Defendant:
Rabekah Mooneyham, Board of Corrections, Penny Lewis and others
Plaintiff:
L G
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Galbreath et al v. United States of America
as 1:2020cv00373
Defendant:
United States of America and Doe Defendants 1-100
Plaintiff:
Sean Galbreath, Carolyn Galbreath and L. G.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2674
N. G. et al v. E.L. HAYNES PUBLIC CHARTER SCHOOL et al
as 1:2020cv01807
Plaintiff:
AARON GRAHAM, N. G., AMY GRAHAM and others
Defendant:
E.L. HAYNES PUBLIC CHARTER SCHOOL
Cause Of Action: 20 U.S.C. § 1401
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2020cv00703
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
