Cases 1 - 10 of 35
BUNDICK et al v. USA
as 1:2023cv01036
Plaintiff:
CLINTON L. BUNDICK, DANA T. BUNDICK, BILLY K. EAST and others
Defendant:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1491 Tucker Act
Stock v. Gray et al
as 2:2022cv04104
Plaintiff:
Ms. Ashley H. Stock and Ashley H. Stock
Defendant:
Mr. James L. Gray, III, Christian S. Tadrus, Douglas R. Lang and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
United Services Automobile Association v. PNC Bank, N.A.
as 2:2022cv00128
In Re:
Jason L. Gray
Plaintiff:
United Services Automobile Association
Defendant:
PNC Bank N.A.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
United Services Automobile Association v. PNC Bank, N.A.
as 3:2022cv00569
In Re:
Jason L. Gray
Plaintiff:
United Services Automobile Association
Defendant:
PNC Bank, N.A.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Kevin Herriott v. C. Burton
as 21-7082
Plaintiff / Appellant:
KEVIN HERRIOTT
Defendant / Appellee:
CHARLES BURTON, Warden, T. ROBERTSON, Associate Warden and L. GRAY, Mailroom Personnel
USA v. Pavis Gray
as 20-12483
Defendant / Appellant:
PAVIS LEVAR GRAY, a.k.a. Chiz, a.k.a. Chiz Gray, a.k.a. Pavis Lavor Gray, a.k.a. Pavis Gray, a.k.a. Pavis Lavant Gray, a.k.a. Pavis L. Gray
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
USA v. Pavis Gray
as 19-14104
Defendant / Appellant:
PAVIS LEVAR GRAY, a.k.a. Chiz, a.k.a. Chiz Gray, a.k.a. Pavis Lavor Gray, a.k.a. Pavis Gray, a.k.a. Pavis Lavant Gray, a.k.a. Pavis L. Gray
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Patrick Gray v. Department of Veterans Affairs
as 19-71127
Petitioner:
PATRICK L. GRAY
Respondent:
DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS AFFAIRS, Regional (Seattle, WA)
Malcolm Gray v. Dwight Neven, et al
as 19-15492
Defendant:
MENTAL HEALTH PROVIDERS, E. K. MCDANIEL and GREG COX
Defendant / Appellee:
ROBERT OWENS, Sgt, BRUCE STROUD, DWIGHT NEVEN, Warden and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MALCOLM L. GRAY
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
