Cases 1 - 10 of 73
Dwayne Johnson v. Commonwealth of Virginia
as 24-6367
Petitioner:
DWAYNE L. JOHNSON
Respondent:
COMMONWEALTH OF VIRGINIA
Johnson v. Woods et al
as 4:2024cv01582
Plaintiff:
Timothy Johnson, Timothy L. Johnson and Timothy Leverne Johnson
Defendant:
Glenn Woods, Rhett Holden, Rodney A. Bostick and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights, State Filers
Keith Cureton, Jr. v. John Gray
as 24-6282
Plaintiff:
KEITH CURETON, JR.
Defendant:
JOHN R. GRAY, MARK FLEMMINGS, MONICA BOND and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00208
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Johnson v. Brown
as 3:2023cv00247
Petitioner:
Ronald L. Johnson
Respondent:
Warden Brown
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Johnson v. Commonwealth of Virginia
as 2:2023cv00553
Petitioner:
Dwayne L. Johnson
Respondent:
Commonwealth of Virginia
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Johnson v. United States of America
as 5:2023cv00602
Petitioner:
Aabrial L. Johnson
Respondent:
United States of America and Warden Holzapfel
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Guy v. Office of General Counsel et al
as 1:2023cv03889
Plaintiff:
Frederick Guy
Defendant:
Office of General Counsel, AW Brenda Hick-man, Work Official Kenneth Perry and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights, State Filers
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv00312
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Johnson v. Doer
as 4:2023cv02193
Petitioner:
Virgil Johnson and Virgil L. Johnson
Respondent:
J. Doer
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
