Cases 1 - 10 of 23
KM SPIRITUAL COLLECTIVE CONFEDERATION et al v. UNITED STATES et al
as 1:2021cv00879
Plaintiff:
MICHIGAN MOTHER MEDICINE CHURCH OF KM, TIMOTHY LOCKARD, AARON GIBBS and others
Defendant:
SEAN REYES, STATE OF OREGON, UNITED STATES and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2020cv05258
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Locke et al. v. Southern Insurance Company
as 6:2017cv00267
Plaintiff:
Robert L. Locke, Jr. and Locke Properties, LLC
Defendant:
Southern Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Locke v. Colvin
as 1:2015cv00012
Plaintiff:
Earl L. Locke
Defendant:
Carolyn W. Colvin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
United States of America v. Lock et al
as 2:2014cv02249
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Stacy L Lock, Joshua R Lock and Leisure Time Estates Property Owners Association
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345
Locke et al v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as WVS/2:14-cv-00478
Plaintiff:
Kathy L. Locke and James H. Locke
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc. , Ethicon, LLC and Johnson & Johnson
Million v. Manuel et al
as 4:2014cv00205
Plaintiff:
Charlie Lee Million
Defendant:
R. Manuel, D. Stark, M. Hodges and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Locke v. Boston Scientific Corporation
as 2:2014cv00722
Plaintiff:
Alice L. Locke
Defendant:
Boston Scientific Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Locke et al v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 2:2014cv00478
Plaintiff:
Kathy L. Locke and James H. Locke
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc. , Ethicon, LLC and Johnson & Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Hamilton v. California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation et al
as 3:2013cv03785
Plaintiff:
Terrance Hamilton, Charlie Lee Million and Devon Davis
Defendant:
California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation, Edmund G. Brown, Jr., George Giurbino and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
