Cases 1 - 10 of 296
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv00042
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451 Employment Discrimination
Norwood v. Caddo et al
as 5:2021cv04313
Plaintiff:
Gregory L Norwood
Defendant:
Caddo Parish, District Court Caddo Parish, District Attorneys Office Caddo Parish and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Norwood v. Caddo Parish
as 5:2021cv03625
Plaintiff:
Gregory L Norwood
Defendant:
Sheriffs Office of Caddo Parish, Steve Prator, R Farris and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Washington et al v. Norwood et al
as 2:2021cv14192
Plaintiff:
Marlo Washington and Micheal Gatewood
Defendant:
W. Millette, Unknown Prison Official, R. Lombard and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Washington et al v. Norwood et al
as 2:2021cv00316
Plaintiff:
Marlo Washington and Micheal Gatewood
Defendant:
W. Millette, Unknown Prison Official, R. Lombard and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Walker v. Schult
as 20-2415
Defendant:
Steven Wagner, Associate Warden, FCI Ray Brook, Anne Mary Carter, Associate Warden, FCI Ray Brook, J. L. Norwood, Regional Director and others
Defendant / Appellant:
Jackii Sepanek, Counselor, FCI Ray Brook and Deborah G. Schult, Warden, FCI Ray Brook
Plaintiff / Appellee:
Ellis Walker
Howard v. Waddell et al
as 7:2020cv00035
Defendant:
Linda Copeland, Michael J Waddell, Tommy L Norwood and others
Plaintiff:
Alex JaRaun Howard
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Norwood v. USA
as 2:2019cv12866
Respondent:
United States of America
Petitioner:
Alexandra L Norwood
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Antwone L. Norwood v. David Baughman
as 2:2019cv02497
Petitioner:
Antone L. Norwood
Respondent:
David Baughman
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Mills v. Davis-Director TDCJ-CID et al
as 3:2019cv00583
Defendant:
Dr Lannette Linthicum, Tommy L Norwood, Dr. Marcia J Odal and others
Plaintiff:
Nicholas Mills
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
