Cases 1 - 10 of 84
Scott v. Hughes et al
as 3:2024cv03110
Plaintiff:
Delon Scott
Defendant:
Latoya Hughes, Brittany Greene, Tara Goins and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Patton #277153 v. Thornell et al
as 2:2023cv02111
Petitioner:
Jerry Leon Patton and Jerry L Patton
Respondent:
Ryan Thornell and Attorney General of the State of Arizona
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Patton v. Locklear
as 5:2022ct03431
Plaintiff:
Randy L. Patton
Defendant:
Mary Locklear
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Curley v. Martinez et al
as 2:2022cv00184
Plaintiff:
Tony Curley
Defendant:
Teresa S Martinez, James L Sutton, Justine D Anderson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Coffman v. Delgado Hernandez et al
as 2:2022cv00069
Plaintiff:
Dan Coffman
Defendant:
Andres N Delgado Hernandez, Matthew R Tiffin, Antonious D Flanagan and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Banks v. Texas et al
as 2:2021cv00238
Plaintiff:
Brian Edward Banks
Defendant:
Texas, TDCJ-CID, NFN Carter and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2021cv02275
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e
Clark Thomas v. Charleston County
as 21-6646
Defendant / Appellee:
R. MARKLEY DENNIS, ORIN G. BRIGGS, I, SCARLETT A. WILSON and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
CLARK D. THOMAS, a/k/a George K. Nichols
PATTON v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 8:2020cv15853
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
MARK L. PATTON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Bobby Patton, Jr. v. Joshua Csaszar, Warden
as 20-60405
Petitioner / Appellant:
BOBBY L. PATTON, JR.
Respondent / Appellee:
JOSHUA CSASZAR, Warden, Southern Mississippi Correctional Institution
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
