Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 94
Webster v. CHP Correctional Health Partners
as 24-1134
Plaintiff: RONALD L. WEBSTER
Defendant: CHP CORRECTIONAL HEALTH PARTNERS
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv02716
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Cardenas v. United States of America et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 4:2023cv00745
Plaintiff: Robert L Webster, bryan busch and Maria Cardenas
Defendant: United States of America, Attorney General of the United States, Officer FNU Curiel and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346 Tort Claim
Webster v. Webster/Cross
as 1:2023cv00805
Plaintiff: Chris L. Webster
Defendant: Leanne Webster/Cross
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question
WEBSTER v. CARTER JR et al
as 1:2022cv02416
Plaintiff: TOBY L. WEBSTER
Defendant: ROBERT E CARTER JR, DAUSS, INDIANA DEPT CORRECTIONS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
WEBSTER v. CARTER JR. et al
as 1:2022cv02374
Plaintiff: TOBY L. WEBSTER
Defendant: ROBERT E. CARTER JR., DAUSS, DENNIS REAGAL and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Webster v. Warden, Lebanon Correctional Institution We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2022cv04343
Petitioner: Desmond L Webster
Respondent: Warden, Lebanon Correctional Institution
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Marco Webster v. Dennis Reagle
as 22-3062
Petitioner / Appellant: MARCO L. WEBSTER
Respondent / Appellee: DENNIS REAGLE, Warden
Marco Webster v. Chris Ertel
as 22-2519
Petitioner / Appellant: MARCO L. WEBSTER
Respondent / Appellee: CHRIS ERTEL, Deputy Warden
COVINGTON v. MARRIS et al
as 1:2022cv00673
Plaintiff: MARCUS WAYNE COVINGTON
Defendant: AMANDA MARRIS, KENDRA BLINN MONTGOMERY, ORLANDO F. HUDSON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?