Cases 1 - 10 of 100
(PC) Cannavan v. Newsom et al
as 1:2026cv05670
Plaintiff:
Patrick A. Cannavan
Defendant:
Gavin Newsom, CDCR, Jeff Macomber and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lamas et al v. Cube Entertainment, Inc.
as 1:2026cv06130
Plaintiff:
Erich S. Lamas and Adriana Lima
Defendant:
Cube Entertainment, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity Action
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2026cv01896
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
(PC) Hutchinson v. California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation et al
as 2:2026cv02343
Plaintiff:
Knolts Hutchinson
Defendant:
California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation, Lamas, W. Lewis and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lamas v. Huffman
as 1:2026cv05495
Plaintiff:
Erich S. Lamas
Defendant:
Steve Huffman
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 fr Diversity-Fraud
Lamas v. XCorp et al
as 1:2026cv05496
Plaintiff:
Erich S. Lamas
Defendant:
XCorp, Jack Dorsey, Elon Musk and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 fr Diversity-Fraud
Lamas v. SVCV, Inc. et al
as 1:2026cv05475
Plaintiff:
Erich S Lamas and SVCV, Inc.
Defendant:
Ashley Zheng, Reddit, Inc. and Does 1-10
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity Action
Lamas v. Hopkins et al
as 1:2026cv05473
Plaintiff:
Erich S. Lamas
Defendant:
Markus Hopkins, Steven Witt, Matt McConnell and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 fr Diversity-Fraud
Coriz v. Sheridan et al
as 2:2026cv04471
Plaintiff:
Kaylene Lamae Coriz
Defendant:
Gerald Sheridan, Maricopa County Sheriff Office, Unknown Parties and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lamas v. Xue et al
as 1:2026cv05472
Plaintiff:
Erich S Lamas
Defendant:
Elise Xue, Daniel Vermont, Takunda Jora and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 fr Diversity-Fraud
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
