Cases 11 - 20 of 21
BOMBALSKI v. LANXESS CORPORATION
as 2:2013cv01653
Plaintiff:
LINDSAY BOMBALSKI
Defendant:
LANXESS CORPORATION
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. AIR PRODUCTS AND CHEMICALS, INC. et al
as 2:2013cv06695
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant:
AIR PRODUCTS AND CHEMICALS, INC., AKZO NOBEL COATINGS, INC., ALCATEL-LUCENT USA INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 9613
Jacobs v. BF Goodrich Company et al
as 1:2011cv00395
Plaintiff:
Gloria Jacobs
Defendant:
BF Goodrich Company, Lanxess Corporation and Bayer Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Supply Chain Connect LLC v. BASF Corporation et al
as 1:2011cv00513
Plaintiff:
Supply Chain Connect LLC
Defendant:
BASF Corporation , BP Chemical Company, Dow Chemical Company and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1338
Griffin v. Lanxess Corporation
as 1:2009cv02556
Plaintiff:
Gregory J. Griffin
Defendant:
Lanxess Corporation
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 621 Job Discrimination (Age)
Lanxess Corporation v. Stegall
as 1:2009cv00493
Plaintiff:
Lanxess Corporation
Defendant:
Michael Stegall
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2009cv00121
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Polk v. Lanxess Corporation et al
as 1:2008cv00724
Defendant:
Lanxess Corporation, Lanxess Corporation, Scott Passmore and others
Plaintiff:
Sanders Polk, III
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Dupree v. Lanxess Corporation
as 1:2008cv00594
Plaintiff:
Marla Dupree
Defendant:
Lanxess Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Golden Trade, S.R.L. v. Lanxess Corporation, et al.
as 4:2007cv01164
Plaintiff:
Golden Trade, S.R.L.
Defendant:
Lanxess Corporation, Capital Mercury Apparel Ltd., American Rag Cie, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1126 Patent Infringement
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
