Cases 41 - 50 of 78
Morgan (ID 76445) v. Kansas, State of
as 5:2012cv03217
Petitioner:
Aaron Lee Morgan
Respondent:
Kansas, State of and Attorney General of Kansas
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Morgan v. DePuy Orthopaedics, Inc. et al
as 1:2012dp22242
Plaintiff:
Ronald Lee Morgan
Defendant:
DePuy Orthopaedics, Inc. , DePuy Inc. , DePuy International Limited and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Morgan et al v. American Medical Systems, Inc.
as 2:2012cv02129
Plaintiff:
Brenda Gail Morgan and Roy Lee Morgan
Defendant:
American Medical Systems, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Morgan et al v. American Medical Systems, Inc.
as 4:2012cv02565
Plaintiff:
Brenda Gail Morgan and Roy Lee Morgan
Defendant:
American Medical Systems, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Morgan et al v. American Medical Systems, Inc.
as CAN/4:12-cv-02565
Plaintiff:
Brenda Gail Morgan and Roy Lee Morgan
Defendant:
American Medical Systems, Inc.
Morgan v. City Of Memphis, Tennessee;
as 2:2012cv02113
Defendant:
City Of Memphis, Tennessee; , Charles Wren , Matthew Pepper and others
Plaintiff:
Jay Lee Morgan
Miscellaneou:
Jimmy Moore
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Morgan v. Babcock
as 2:2011cv03191
Petitioner:
Jerry Lee Morgan
Respondent:
Michael Babcock
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Benoit et al v. Lafarge S.A. et al
as 2:2011cv01893
Plaintiff:
Richard Benoit , Carol Benoit , Jason Borowski and others
Defendant:
Lafarge S.A., Lafarge Boral Gypsum in Asia, Lafarge Onoda Gypsum in Shanghai and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Morgan v. Sebelius
as 3:2011cv00300
Plaintiff:
Breton Lee Morgan
Defendant:
Kathleen Sebelius
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Paul Morgan v. Ginny Lamneck, et al
as 11-3400
Plaintiff - Appellee:
PAUL LEE MORGAN
Defendant - Appellant:
GINNY LAMNECK and OSCAR YOUNG, Individually as an Employee of the State of Ohio
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
