Cases 1 - 10 of 11
National Shooting Sports Foundation Inc v. Ferguson
as 2:2023cv00113
Plaintiff:
National Shooting Sports Foundation, Inc. and National Shooting Sports Foundation Inc
Defendant:
Robert W. Ferguson, Attorney General of the State of Washington and Robert W Ferguson
Intervenor Defendant:
Alliance for Gun Responsibility
Amicus Curiae:
Everytown for Gun Safety, Giffords Law Center to Prevent Gun Violence, Brady Center to Prevent Gun Violence and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Constitutionality of State Statute(s)
National Shooting Sports Foundation v. Attorney General New Jersey
as 23-1214
Plaintiff / Appellee:
NATIONAL SHOOTING SPORTS FOUNDATION
Defendant / Appellant:
ATTORNEY GENERAL NEW JERSEY
Appellant:
STATE OF ILLINOIS, et al, COUNTY PROSECUTOR'S ASSOCIATION OF NEW JERSEY, BRADY CENTER TO PREVENT GUN VIOLENCE and others
WARREN v. DESANTIS
as 4:2022cv00302
Plaintiff:
ANDREW H WARREN
Defendant:
RON DESANTIS
Amicus Curiae:
FORMER PROSECUTORS ATTORNEY GENERAL JUDGES UNITED STATES ATTORNEYS AND FEDERAL OFFICIALS AND CURRENT AND FORMER LAW ENFORCEMENT OFFICIALS AND LEADERS, LEGAL SCHOLARS, CONSTITUTION REVISION COMMISSION MEMBERS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
State of Delaware v. BP America Inc, et al
as 22-1096
Plaintiff / Appellee:
STATE OF DELAWARE, ex rel. Kathleen Jennings, Attorney General of the State of Delaware
Defendant / Appellant:
BP AMERICA INC, BP PLC, CHEVRON CORP and others
Appellant:
NATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF MANUFACTURERS, CHAMBER OF COMMERCE OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, STATE OF INDIANA and others
Amicus Curiae:
NATIONAL LEAGUE OF CITIES, UNITED STATES CONFERENCE OF MAYORS, PUBLIC CITIZEN INC and others
County of Maui v. Chevron USA Inc., et al
as 21-15318
Defendant / Appellant:
BP AMERICA, INC., CHEVRON USA INC., ALOHA PETROLEUM LLC and others
Plaintiff / Appellee:
COUNTY OF MAUI
Amicus Curiae:
CHAMBER OF COMMERCE OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, RICHARD BOWMAN MYERS, United States Air Force General (Retired), MICHAEL GLENN MULLEN, United States Navy Admiral (Retired) and others
City & County of Honolulu v. Sunoco LP, et al
as 21-15313
Defendant / Appellant:
MARATHON PETROLEUM CORP., BP AMERICA, INC., CHEVRON USA INC. and others
Plaintiff / Appellee:
CITY & COUNTY OF HONOLULU
Defendant:
DOES, 1 through 100 inclusive
Amicus Curiae:
CHAMBER OF COMMERCE OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, RICHARD BOWMAN MYERS, United States Air Force General (Retired), MICHAEL GLENN MULLEN, United States Navy Admiral (Retired) and others
US v. MacGregor
as 20-1794
Defendant / Appellant:
WESLEY MACGREGOR
Interested Party:
MASSACHUSETTS ASSOCIATION OF CRIMINAL DEFENSE LAWYERS, COMMONWEALTH OF MASSACHUSETTS, AD HOC COMMITTEE FOR JUDICIAL INDEPENDENCE and others
Appellee:
UNITED STATES
US v. Joseph
as 20-1787
Interested Party:
MASSACHUSETTS ASSOCIATION OF CRIMINAL DEFENSE LAWYERS, COMMONWEALTH OF MASSACHUSETTS, AD HOC COMMITTEE FOR JUDICIAL INDEPENDENCE and others
Defendant / Appellant:
SHELLEY M. RICHMOND JOSEPH
Appellee:
UNITED STATES
Ragbir v. Sessions III, et al
as 1:2018cv00236
Respondent:
Jefferson Sessions, III , Kirstjen Nielsen , Thomas Decker and others
Petitioner:
Ravidath Lawrence Ragbir
Amicu:
Amici Curiae New York Civil Liberties Union and American Civil Liberties Union and Amici Curiae Legal Scholars and Advocates
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Brian Davison v. Phyllis Randall
as 17-2003
Amicus Curiae:
REBECCA TUSHNET, Frank Stanton Professor of First Amendment Law, Harvard Law School, HELEN L. NORTON, Professor and Ira C. Rothgerber, Jr. Chair in Constitutional Law, University of Colorado School of Law, ACLU OF WEST VIRGINIA and others
Defendant:
LEO P. ROGERS, In his official capacity, RON MEYER, In his official capacity, TONY BUFFINGTON, In his official capacity and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
BRIAN DAVISON
Defendant / Appellee:
PHYLLIS RANDALL, In her official and individual capacity and LOUDOUN COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS, In their official and individual capacities
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
