Cases 1 - 10 of 94
LEWIS JONES et al v. JOHNSON & JOHNSON et al
as 3:2023cv15574
Plaintiff:
RAYMOND LEWIS JONES and THE ESTATE OF MARY M. HERRING
Defendant:
JOHNSON & JOHNSON, JOHNSON & JOHNSON CONSUMER, INC., LTL MANAGEMENT, LLC and others
In Re:
JOHNSON & JOHNSON TALCUM POWDER PRODUCTS MARKETING, SALES PRACTICES, AND PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Jones et al v. Ideal Lending, LLC et al
as 2:2022cv01123
Plaintiff:
Lewis Jones and Amanda Jones
Defendant:
Ideal Lending, LLC, AAA Repo, Gary Wagnon and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Tort/Non-Motor Vehic
Jones v. Warden
as 3:2022cv00479
Petitioner:
Audrain Lewis Jones
Respondent:
Warden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Jones v. Warden
as 1:2022cv00209
Petitioner:
Audrain Lewis Jones
Respondent:
Warden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Jones v. Wells
as 5:2021cv03795
Plaintiff:
Lewis Jones
Defendant:
Cpt Wells and Major Anderson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
JONES v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2021cv66095
Plaintiff:
LEWIS JONES
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Jones v. Thompson et al
as 3:2021cv00019
Defendant:
Diane Thews, WVCF (Court Use Only) and Joseph Thompson
Plaintiff:
Lewis Jones
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2020cv03399
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jones v. Sandoval
as 3:2020cv07620
Defendant:
M. Sandoval
Plaintiff:
Timothy Lewis Jones
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
JONES v. THOMPSON et al
as 2:2020cv00428
Defendant:
DIANE THEWS and JOSEPH THOMPSON
Plaintiff:
LEWIS JONES
Interested Party:
JAHON JONES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
