Cases 11 - 20 of 70
Blochowicz v. Wilkie et al
as 1:2020cv00111
Defendant:
Joan Weber, Robert Wilkie, Michelle Cox-Henley and others
Plaintiff:
Kimberly M. Blochowicz and Jeffrey M. Blochowicz
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961
Schlosser v. Carter et al
as 3:2020cv00434
Defendant:
Jane Doe, Department of Correction, Chelsea and others
Plaintiff:
Jeffrey Schlosser
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 0:2018cv02516
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
Fields v. Godinez et al
as 3:2017cv01258
Plaintiff:
Tuan C. Fields, Sr.
Defendant:
Salvador Godinez, Donald Stolworthy, Gladyse Taylor and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Crenshaw v. Godinez et al
as 3:2017cv01260
Defendant:
Salvador Godinez, Donald Stolworthy, Gladyse Taylor and others
Plaintiff:
Michael Crenshaw
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2017cv06388
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
CARTER v. JOHNSON & JOHNSON et al
as 3:2017cv10011
Plaintiff:
LINDA CARTER
Defendant:
JOHNSON & JOHNSON , JOHNSON & JOHNSON CONSUMER, INC. and IMERYS TALC, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Blaney v. Godinez et al
as 3:2017cv01099
Plaintiff:
Jeffrey Blaney
Defendant:
Salvador Godinez, Donald Stolworthy, Gladyse Taylor and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Evans v. Peters et al
as 2:2017cv00786
Defendant:
Doug Abbott, Lt. Steve Boston, C.O. Linda Carter and others
Plaintiff:
Michael James Evans
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Moore et al v. Johnson & Johnson et al
as 3:2017cv02404
Plaintiff:
CASSANDRA MOORE , Karen Gallia , Lynne Thompson and others
Defendant:
JOHNSON & JOHNSON , JOHNSON & JOHNSON CONSUMER COMPANIES INC. and IMERYS TALC AMERICA INC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
