Cases 1 - 10 of 137
United States of America v. The Premises, Buildings, Appurtenances, Improvements, and Real Property Located at 15 Elizabeth Drive, Lockport, New York,
as 1:2023cv01298
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
The Premises and Real Property at 15 Elizabeth Drive, Lockport, New York and The Premises, Buildings, Appurtenances, Improvements, and Real Property Located at 15 Elizabeth Drive, Lockport, New York,
Claimant:
Ostolski Property Management LLC, Michael Ostolski, Dawn Ostolski and others
Cause Of Action: 21 U.S.C. § 881 Forfeiture Property - Real Estate
United States of America v. Chen et al
as 1:2023cv01273
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Claimant:
Shu Chen, Yong Hui Chen and Green Emerald Paradise, LLC
Cause Of Action: 21 U.S.C. § 881 Forfeiture Property-Drugs
USA v. 1979 Learjet 25D Century III, Tail No. N25CY
as 2:2023cv02094
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
1979 Learjet 25D Century III, Tail No. N25CY, Approximately $394,741.75 in U.S. Currency, Approximately $37,825.70 in U.S. Currency and others
Claimant:
ARC Jets, LLC and Manish Patel
Cause Of Action: 21 U.S.C. § 881 Forfeiture Property-Drugs
USA v. 84902 Hideaway Hills Road, City of Eugene, et al.
as 6:2023cv01226
Plaintiff:
USA
Defendant:
84902 Hideaway Hills Road, City of Eugene, Lane County, State and District of Oregon, $129,822.00 (U.S.), $4,000.00 (U.S.) and others
Claimant:
Kit and Karen Chan Family LLC, Karen Chan and Kit Chan
Cause Of Action: 21 U.S.C. § 881 Forfeiture Property-Drugs
United States of America v. One (1) 2016 Rolls Royce Wraith, VIN SCA665C5XGUX86171, with All Appurtenances and Attachments Thereon et al
as 2:2023cv02072
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
One (1) 2016 Rolls Royce Wraith, VIN SCA665C5XGUX86171, with All Appurtenances and Attachments Thereon and One (1) 2017 Chevrolet Corvette, VIN 1G1YU2D62H5604383, with All Appurtenances and Attachments Thereon
Claimant:
Nakita Cannady, Kimberly Clark Credit Union, Terry Kuhn and others
Cause Of Action: 21 U.S.C. § 881 Forfeiture Property-Drugs
United States of America v. The Premises and Real Property with Buildings, Appurtenances, and Improvements at 4240 Wolf Run, Lewiston, New York, that is, all that tract and parcel of land, situate in the Town of Lewiston, Count
as 1:2023cv00027
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
THE PREMISES AND REAL PROPERTY WITH BUILDINGS, APPURTENANCES, AND IMPROVEMENTS AT 4240 WOLF RUN, LEWISTON, NEW YORK, THAT IS, ALL THAT TRACT AND PARCEL OF LAND, SITUATE IN THE TOWN OF LEWISTON, COUNT
Claimant:
Toorak Capital Partners, LLC
Cause Of Action: 21 U.S.C. § 881 Forfeiture Property-Drugs
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. $149,020.00 UNITED STATES CURRENCY
as 1:2022cv02300
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant:
$149,020.00 UNITED STATES CURRENCY
Claimant:
HAIMOV JEWELERS, LLC
Cause Of Action: 21 U.S.C. § 881 Forfeiture Property-Drugs
United States of America v. $108,790.00 in United States Currency et al
as 2:2022cv02810
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
$108,790.00 in United States Currency
Claimant:
Adarious Jaquez Smith, M Cove Logistics LLC and Plug Brudaz Entertainment LLC
Cause Of Action: 21 U.S.C. § 881 Forfeiture Property-Drugs
United States of America v. $697,165.89 In Funds Seized From Bank Of America Account Number Xxxxxx8543 Held In The Name Of On Solutions Group LLC
as 1:2022cv03016
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
$697,165.89 In Funds Seized From Bank Of America Account Number xxxxxx8543 Held In The Name Of On Solutions Group LLC
Claimant:
On Solutions Group LLC
Cause Of Action: 21 U.S.C. § 881 Forfeiture Property-Drugs
United States of America v. $175,000 in United States Currency
as 4:2022cv01570
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
$175,000 in United States Currency
Claimant:
Ely Nestarez, Jaime Valdivia, First American Land Trust Company, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 21 U.S.C. § 881 Forfeiture Property-Drugs
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
