Cases 1 - 10 of 11
Saundra White v. Hudgins
as 22-7268
Petitioner / Appellant:
SAUNDRA LUCILLE WHITE
Respondent / Appellee:
WARDEN HUDGINS, Hazelton Complex Correctional Compound, Official Capacity, SFF WARDEN P. ADAMS, Official and Personal Capacity, SFF K-UNIT MANAGER LORI SMITH, Official and Personal Capacity and others
WHITE v. HUDGINS et al
as 5:2022cv00207
Petitioner:
SAUNDRA L. WHITE and SAUNDRA L WHITE
Respondent:
HUDGINS, P. ADAMS, LORI SMITH and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
White v. Hudgins et al
as 5:2022cv00203
Petitioner:
Saundra L. White
Respondent:
Warden Hudgins, SFF Warden P. Adams, SFF K-Unit Manager Lori Smith and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
White v. Hudgins et al
as 5:2021cv00069
Petitioner:
Saundra L. White
Respondent:
L. Compton, T. Slinka, M. Ware and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Tawe v. Roesler et al
as 4:2017cv03442
Plaintiff:
Richard N. Tawe
Defendant:
Michael Roesler, Charles H Landis, Keith Gorsuch and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Behlmann v. Shrader et al
as 2:2017cv00024
Plaintiff:
Jeremy R. Behlmann
Defendant:
J. Shrader, Joe Goodwin, Jim Willer and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Oblad v. Crowther et al
as 2:2017cv00102
Plaintiff:
Brian Oblad
Defendant:
Scott Crowther, Lori Smith, FNU Blavis and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bell v. Morgan et al
as 5:2016cv00706
Plaintiff:
Joe T Bell
Defendant:
Sean Patrick Morgan, Janet Cox, Nathan Lewis Dills and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Reed v. Sheriff Lori Smith
as 1:2015cv00949
Petitioner:
Robin Reed
Defendant:
Sheriff Lori Smith
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Escobar v. United States Of America et al
as 3:2011cv02940
Plaintiff:
Pedro Escobar
Defendant:
United States Of America and Lorie Smith
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
