Cases 1 - 9 of 9
US v. Scanlan, et al
as 26-1783
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES
Defendant:
DAVID M. SCANLAN, New Hampshire Secretary of State, STATE OF NEW HAMPSHIRE, NEAL KURK and others
Interested Party:
DEMOCRATIC NATIONAL COMMITTEE, AMERICAN CIVIL LIBERTIES UNION OF NEW HAMPSHIRE, LEAGUE OF WOMEN VOTERS OF NEW HAMPSHIRE and others
USA v. NH Secretary of State et al
as 1:2025cv00371
Plaintiff:
USA
Defendant:
NH Secretary of State and NH, State of
Intervenor:
Neal Kurk, Robert Perry, Louise Spencer and others
Amicus Curiae:
Democratic National Committee, AMERICAN CIVIL LIBERTIES UNION OF NEW HAMPSHIRE, League of Women Voters of New Hampshire and others
Cause Of Action: Civil Miscellaneous Case
Spencer v. E. I. du Pont de Nemours and Company
as 2:2015cv00303
Plaintiff:
Pansy Louise Spencer
Defendant:
E. I. du Pont de Nemours and Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Spencer v. E. I. du Pont de Nemours and Company
as 2:2014cv31116
Plaintiff:
Pansy Louise Spencer
Defendant:
E. I. du Pont de Nemours and Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Spencer v. SSA
as 5:2014cv00352
Plaintiff:
Kristy Louise Spencer
Defendant:
Commissioner of SSA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Spencer v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 2:2014cv19313
Plaintiff:
Vickie Louise Spencer
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc. and Johnson & Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Karen Louise Spencer v. Michael J. Astrue
as 5:2012cv01027
Defendant:
Michael J Astrue
Plaintiff:
Karen Louise Spencer
Karen Louise Spencer v. Michael J. Astrue
as 5:2010cv00858
Defendant:
Michael J Astrue
Plaintiff:
Karen Louise Spencer
GREEN et al v. A.P. GREEN INDUSTRIES, INC. et al
as 2:2009cv87719
Plaintiff:
MERLE LOUISE SPENCER GREEN and MERLE LOUISE SPENCER GREEN
Defendant:
A.P. GREEN INDUSTRIES, INC., ARMSTRONG WORLD INDUSTRIES, INC., ASBESTOS CLAIMS MANAGEMENT CORPORATION FORMERLY KNOWN AS NATIONAL GYPSUM COMPANY and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
