Cases 1 - 10 of 582
Lovelace v. Campbell et al
as 1:2024cv01220
Plaintiff:
Pauline Abby Lovelace
Defendant:
Delores Campbell, Detective Warren Brown and Claudette Daley
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Lovelace v. Pollan
as 24-60075
Plaintiff:
John Lovelace, Jr.
Defendant:
Greg Pollan, Sheriff and Andy Eubanks, Jail Administrator
Lovelace v. Xue et al
as 1:2024cv00612
Plaintiff:
Pauline Abby Lovelace
Defendant:
Hang Xue, Bee Chu, Tan et al and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1601 Truth in Lending
Lovelace v. The United States Government
as 1:2023cv05981
Plaintiff:
Michael Patrick Lovelace, Jr.
Defendant:
The United States Government
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Dotson et al v. Alabama Department of Corrections et al
as 2:2023cv01657
Plaintiff:
Audrey Marie Dotson and Audrey South
Defendant:
Alabama Department of Corrections, John Q. Hamm, Greg Lovelace and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 0:2023cv03386
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Lovelace v. Strength of Nature LLC
as 1:2023cv15071
Plaintiff:
Jackie Lovelace
Defendant:
Strength of Nature LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Lovelace v. LOreal USA Inc. et al
as 1:2023cv14723
Plaintiff:
Jacinda Lovelace
Defendant:
LOreal USA Inc., LOreal USA Products Inc., SoftSheen-Carson, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv02728
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Removal - Employment Discrimination (Race)
LOVELACE v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 3:2023cv23493
Plaintiff:
ZACHARY LOVELACE
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
