Cases 1 - 10 of 14
Ponder v. Stone
as 8:2025cv03026
Plaintiff:
Marquise D. Ponder
Defendant:
Lt. Stone
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ponder v. Stone
as 3:2025cv01309
Plaintiff:
Marquise D. Ponder
Defendant:
Lt. Stone
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ponder v. Jett et al
as 8:2025cv02922
Plaintiff:
Marquise Devon Ponder
Defendant:
Chief Executive William Jett, Patrick Kane, Lt. Stone and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ponder v. Stone
as 8:2025cv02750
Plaintiff:
Marquise D. Ponder
Defendant:
Lt. Stone
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
DAVIS v. STATE OF NEW JERSEY et al
as 2:2022cv03755
Plaintiff:
CARLENE DAVIS
Defendant:
STATE OF NEW JERSEY, NEW JERSEY DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, COUNTY OF ESSEX and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Penigar v. Glassel et al
as 4:2019cv04191
Defendant:
Lt. Stone, Cpt. Mohammed Touhami, RN Boyce and others
Plaintiff:
Pieron D. Penigar and Kieron Derek Penigar
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Buencamino v. United States of America et al
as 5:2014ct03307
Plaintiff:
Victor J. Buencamino
Defendant:
United States of America, Federal Bureau of Prisons, Charles Samuels and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Dwight Freeman v. Terry Collins, et al
as 13-4385
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DWIGHT FREEMAN
Defendant - Appellee:
TERRY J. COLLINS, Director, TROOPER BALL, AL LOUISE and others
Dwight Freeman v. Terry Collins, et al
as 13-3515
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DWIGHT FREEMAN
Defendant - Appellee:
TERRY J. COLLINS, Director, TERRY COLLINS, TROOPER BALL and others
Williams v. Everglades Correctional Institution et al
as 2:2010cv00615
Petitioner:
Gregory Virgil Williams
Respondent:
Everglades Correctional Institution, Catherine Williams, Columbia Correctional Institution Officers and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
