Cases 1 - 10 of 100
LALA et al v. United States of America
as 3:2026cv12482
Plaintiff:
Chaitanya Lala and Ashima Sehgal
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 26 U.S.C. § 7422 IRS: Refund Taxes
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2026cv13834
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2026cv07763
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2026cv13696
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2026cv01482
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2026cv01970
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Pretrial Detainee)
White v. Sylvester
as 1:2026cv03933
Plaintiff:
Ronnie White and Ronnie L Williams
Defendant:
Lala B Sylvester
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
United States of America v. Singletary, II (Caldwell)
as 26-2357
Defendant:
DWIGHT A SINGLETARY, II, MCKENZIE MERRIALICE COLES, NEHEMIAH FANE and others
Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Santos et al v. BDO USA, P.C.
as 1:2026cv25439
Plaintiff:
Anthony Santos, Alex Chimby Productions, Inc., HEY LALA, Inc. and others
Defendant:
BDO USA, P.C.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Other Contract
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2026cv01560
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Pretrial Detainee)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
