Cases 41 - 50 of 869
US v. Terrance Wiggins
as 23-6833
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
TERRANCE LAMAR WIGGINS, a/k/a T-Wig, a/k/a Barnwell
Gash v. Thomas et al
as 9:2023cv04168
Plaintiff:
Kentrell Lamar Gash
Defendant:
Ass. Warden Thomas, Cpt. Gregg, Cpt. McPhaton and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
US v. Roderick Sanford
as 23-6807
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
RODERICK LAMAR SANFORD
Convertino v. Republic Reign LLC et al
as 2:2023cv04075
Plaintiff:
Krissa Convertino
Defendant:
Republic Reign LLC doing business as Republic Garden and Lounge, Leva Bonaparte and Lamar Bonaparte
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Orange Hooker v. USA-2255
as 8:2023cv02250
Petitioner:
Lamar Derrell Orange Hooker
Respondent:
USA-2255
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
US v. Cortney Jenkins
as 23-4500
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
CORTNEY LAMAR JENKINS, a/k/a Boo Man, a/k/a Courtney Lamar Jenkins
Dobbs v. Lovette
as 5:2023cv00268
Petitioner:
Kasper Lamar Dobbs
Respondent:
Warden Lovette
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Williams v. United States of Amerikkka et al
as 1:2023cv02046
Plaintiff:
Lamar A. Williams
Defendant:
United States of Amerikkka and U.S. Marshalls Service of MD; Dept of Justice
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv00985
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Disability Act)
Gayle v. Ray
as 3:2023cv00179
Petitioner:
Lamar Gayle
Respondent:
Warden Ray
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
