Cases 1 - 10 of 711
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv03230
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv11051
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
(SS) Galvan v. Commissioner of the Social Security Administration
as 1:2024cv00340
Plaintiff:
Arnulfo Lamas Galvan
Defendant:
Martin O'Malley, Commissioner of the Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv01642
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans With Disabilities Act
Bazzi v. Celebrity Cruises, Inc.
as 1:2024cv20234
Plaintiff:
Lama Bazzi
Defendant:
Celebrity Cruises, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1333 Admiralty
Hitchcock v. USA
as 2:2023cv00179
Petitioner:
Tyrone Lamas Hitchcock
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Lama v. Progressive Insurance Company
as 3:2023cv02142
Plaintiff:
Jerome Lama
Defendant:
Progressive Insurance Company
Other:
Mediator
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
LAMA v. PROGRESSIVE INSURANCE COMPANY
as 2:2023cv05064
Plaintiff:
Jerome Lama
Defendant:
PROGRESSIVE INSURANCE COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2023cv04581
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
FLOYD v. WALDO COUNTY SHERIFF'S DEPARTMENT et al
as 1:2023cv00379
Plaintiff:
SEAN J FLOYD
Defendant:
WALDO COUNTY SHERIFF'S DEPARTMENT, CODY LAITE, CASEY ASHEY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
