Cases 1 - 10 of 100
Qualcomm Technologies, Inc. v. Wi-LAN Inc.
as 7:2026mc00277
Petitioner:
Qualcomm Technologies, Inc.
Respondent:
Wi-LAN Inc.
Cause Of Action: Motion to Compel
Qualcomm Incorporated et al v. Wi-LAN Inc.
as 1:2026mc01965
Petitioner:
Qualcomm Incorporated and Qualcomm Technologies, Inc.
Respondent:
Wi-LAN Inc.
Cause Of Action: Motion to Compel
Lan et al
as 2:2026cv02092
Petitioner:
Ms. Chan Mei Lan and Ms. Lau So Kim
Cause Of Action: Civil Miscellaneous Case
Shao et al v. LAN Printing Company Inc et al
as 4:2026cv00676
Plaintiff:
Qinghua Shao, Weijiao Huang, Jason Shao and others
Defendant:
LAN Printing Company Inc doing business as Lan Printing, LAN Printing 2026 LLC doing business as Lan Printing, Zhiwei Lan and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Denial of Overtime Compensation
Lanning v. Progressive Select Insurance Company
as 2:2026cv02119
Plaintiff:
Mark Lanning
Defendant:
Progressive Select Insurance Company and Walter Sorokoty
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Auto Negligence
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2026cv02318
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Han et al v. Point Ruston LLC et al
as 3:2026cv05697
Plaintiff:
Bingru Han, Bo Liu, Changjun Gu and others
Defendant:
Point Ruston LLC, Point Ruston Phase II LLC, Loren M Cohen and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Quinto v. Rutherford County Sheriff's Office et al
as 3:2026cv00865
Plaintiff:
Kyro Lan Quinto
Defendant:
Rutherford County Sheriff's Office, Rutherford Co., Lt. f/n/u Edgehill and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Nengtong Lan v. Todd Blanche
as 26-3574
Petitioner:
NENGTONG LAN
Respondent:
TODD W. BLANCHE, Acting U.S. Attorney General
Qualcomm Incorporated et al v. Wi-LAN Inc.
as 1:2026mc00314
Petitioner:
Qualcomm Incorporated and Qualcomm Technologies, Inc.
Respondent:
Wi-LAN Inc.
Cause Of Action: Motion to Compel
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
