Other Statutes Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 151
Nicolette Langston, et al v. NCAA, et al
as 24-8012
Petitioner: NICOLETTE A. LANGSTON, as Administrator of the Estate of ZACK LANGSTON and DANAE YOUNG, as mother and next friend for D.L., a minor
Respondent: NATIONAL COLLEGIATE ATHLETIC ASSOCIATION and MID-AMERICA INTERCOLLEGIATE ATHLETICS ASSOCIATION
US v. Armand Lewis-Langston
as 24-4171
Plaintiff: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant: ARMAND SAQUAN SUFYAN LEWIS-LANGSTON
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv00217
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Account Receivable
US v. Langston
as 23-1337
Appellee: UNITED STATES
Defendant / Appellant: CARL LANGSTON
Fannie Mae et al v. Amelia Aid Propco LLC
as 2:2023mc00012
Plaintiff: Fannie Mae
Defendant: Amelia Aid Propco LLC, Ashley Aid Propco LLC, Bentley Aid Propco LLC and others
Receiver: Michael F Flanagan
Fannie Mae v. Amelia AID Propco LLC et al
as 6:2023cv00050
Plaintiff: Fannie Mae
Defendant: Amelia AID Propco LLC, Ashley AID Propco LLC, Bentley AID Propco and others
Receiver: Michael F. Flanagan
Clark v. Michigan, State of et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2023cv10759
Plaintiff: James Lee Clark, III and Tebtu Shekem
Defendant: Michigan, State of, 50th District Court, Michael C Martinez and others
Tena et al v. Metro Auto Auction LLC
as 2:2023cv00536
Plaintiff: Santos Muniz Tena, George S Wilhelm, Angela Shaffer and others
Defendant: Metro Auto Auction LLC doing business as Metro Auto Auction of Phoenix
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv00208
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
USA v. Isaac Langston
as 22-2100
Plaintiff / Appellee: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant: ISAAC LANGSTON

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?