Cases 31 - 40 of 149
Petersen v. Overstreet et al
as 1:2019cv00607
Defendant:
Adam W. Overstreet, Kenyen R. Brown, William Ryan Kennedy and others
Plaintiff:
David P. Petersen, I
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
(PC) Parks v. Abdur-Rahman et al
as 2:2019cv01589
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Wayne Parks
Defendant:
Randall Lankford and Salahuddin Abdur-Rahman
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Petersen v. Overstreet et al
as 8:2019cv00316
Plaintiff:
David P. Peterson
Defendant:
Adam W. Overstreet, William Ryan Kennedy, Kristina Wake and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
SCOTT v. CITY OF PHILADELPHIA et al
as 2:2019cv02871
Defendant:
CITY OF PHILADELPHIA, POLICE OFFICER, MR. ROBERT HEENEY, PHILADELPHIA POLICE DEPARTMENT and others
Plaintiff:
BERNARD SCOTT
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Nesbitt v. Varnum et al
as 2:2019cv14107
Defendant:
Captain B. Varnum, Colonel J. T. Lankford and Sargeant J. Wilkerson
Plaintiff:
Sean I. Nesbitt
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
LANKFORD v. TALBOT et al
as 1:2018cv03935
Defendant:
WEXFORD OF INDIANA LLC and PAUL TALBOT
Plaintiff:
JACK LANKFORD
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
LANKFORD v. TALBOT
as 1:2018cv03853
Plaintiff:
JACK LANKFORD
Defendant:
PAUL TALBOT
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Glover et al v. Illinois Department of Corrections et al
as 2:2018cv02270
Defendant:
Illinois Department of Corrections, Wexford Corp, Steve Meeks and others
Plaintiff:
Michael Glover, Curtis A Clark, Danny Lillard and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Routt v. Hansford et al
as 4:2018cv00439
Defendant:
Aramark Corporation, Dustin Hansford and Joshua Lankford
Plaintiff:
John Stephen Routt
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ortiz v. Blalock et al
as 4:2018cv01826
Plaintiff:
Joshua Ortiz
Defendant:
M. Blalock, Charles H. Landis, Timothy M. Preischel and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
