Cases 21 - 30 of 32
Calhoun v. San Diego County et al
as 3:2010cv00522
Defendant:
San Diego County, William V. Gallo, Dana M. Sabraw and others
Plaintiff:
Bruce Derrick Calhoun
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Calhoun v. San Diego County et al
as 3:2010cv00434
Plaintiff:
Bruce Derrick Calhoun
Defendant:
San Diego County, Judge Whelan, Judge Gallo and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Calhoun v. San Diego County et al
as 3:2010cv00271
Plaintiff:
Bruce Derrick Calhoun
Defendant:
San Diego County, Greyhound, Imperial Beach City Hall and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Calhoun v. San Diego County et al
as 3:2010cv00009
Plaintiff:
Bruce Derrick Calhoun
Defendant:
San Diego County, Larry Allen Burns, Paradise Valley Hospital and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Larry O. Burns v. A.m. Lockett & Co., et al.
as PAE/2:08-CV-76923
Defendant:
A.m. Lockett & Co
Plaintiff:
Larry O. Burns
BURNS v. A.M. LOCKETT & CO., ET AL.
as 2:2008cv76923
Plaintiff:
LARRY O. BURNS and LARRY O. BURNS
Defendant:
A.M. LOCKETT & COMPANY, LTD., A.P. GREEN INDUSTRIES, INC., ALLIED EQUIPMENT, INCORPORATED and others
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Larry Burns v. Medical Staff at Manning CI
as 08-6071
Plaintiff - Appellant:
LARRY D. BURNS
Defendant - Appellee:
MEDICAL STAFF AT MANNING CI
Burns v. Medical Staff at Manning CI
as 8:2007cv03549
Plaintiff:
Larry D Burns
Defendant:
Medical Staff at Manning CI
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights, State Filers
Robinson v. Burns
as 3:2007cv01380
Plaintiff:
Faustino Robinson
Defendant:
Larry Alan Burns
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Durrani v. Holencik et al
as 3:2007cv01196
Petitioner:
Arif A. Durrani
Respondent:
S. A. Holencik, Larry Alan Burns and Alberto Gonzalez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
