Cases 1 - 10 of 69
Larry White, Jr. v. Secretary, Department of Corrections, et al
as 24-10739
Petitioner:
LARRY FELTON WHITE, JR.
Respondent:
SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS and FLORIDA ATTORNEY GENERAL
White v. Baker et al
as 2:2023cv12091
Plaintiff:
Larry Vance White
Defendant:
Officer Thomas Baker, Officer Rick Zamojski, Officer James Rayner and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
RABINDRAN et al v. USA
as 1:2023cv01086
Plaintiff:
PRASAD RABINDRAN, MONICA HEHO, AISHA TAYLOR and others
Defendant:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1491 Tucker Act
Larry White, II v. Shelby Searls
as 23-6426
Petitioner / Appellant:
LARRY S. WHITE, II
Respondent / Appellee:
SHELBY SEARLS
White v. Brokaw et al
as 9:2023cv00057
Plaintiff:
Larry A. White
Defendant:
Matthew Brokaw, Steven Fleshman, Bryan Stirling and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights, State Filers
White v. Stirling et al
as 9:2022cv04638
Plaintiff:
Larry Anthony White
Defendant:
Bryan Stirling, Charles Williams, Daniel Harouff and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
White v. Stirling et al
as 9:2022cv03000
Plaintiff:
Larry Anthony White
Defendant:
Bryan Stirling, Amy Enloe, Charles Williams and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights, State Filers
Cimarron Drilling Technologies, L.L.C. et al v. Stonehenge Capital Fund Texas, LP et al
as 2:2022cv00202
Plaintiff:
Cimarron Drilling Technologies, L.L.C., CLO&E, LLC, Joey Phillips and others
Defendant:
Stonehenge Capital Fund Texas, LP, Stonehenge Capital Fund Texas II, LP, Nemesio J. Viso and others
Cause Of Action: 11 U.S.C. § 101 Bankruptcy
White v. Director, TDCJ-CID
as 1:2022cv00105
Petitioner:
Larry D White
Respondent:
Director, TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
White v. Searls
as 2:2021cv00523
Petitioner:
Larry S. White, II
Respondent:
Shelby Searls
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
