Cases 1 - 10 of 23
Larry Curtis v. 3M Company, The et al
as 2:2023cv02924
Defendant:
3M Company, The, Du Pont De Nemours Inc, AGC Inc and others
Plaintiff:
Larry Curtis
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Curtis et al v. Taylor et al
as 4:2022cv00328
Plaintiff:
Larry Curtis, Margie Curtis and Dwight Houston
Defendant:
Larry Taylor, Billy Burris, Asa Hutchinson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Other Civil Rights
CURTIS v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2021cv31195
Plaintiff:
LARRY CURTIS
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Curtis v. City of Chicago et al
as 1:2021cv03121
Defendant:
CITY OF CHICAGO and Joseph Scotoni
Plaintiff:
Larry Curtis
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
ECBI WARNER LLC et al v. TOMS et al
as 5:2021cv00148
Defendant:
CLIFFORD HOLMES, KEVIN LASHLEY, THOMAS RANDALL TOMS and others
Plaintiff:
ANTWON ALSOBROOK, eCBI Warner, LLC, JERRALD RECTOR and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Nash v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 4:2020cv00023
Plaintiff:
Larry Curtis Nash, Jr.
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Curtis et al v. Neal et al
as 4:2019cv00770
Defendant:
Justice Ferrell, John Does, Rowdy Reynolds and others
Plaintiff:
Margie Curtis and Larry Curtis
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Larry Tate v. United State
as 16-2870
Petitioner:
Larry Curtis Tate
Respondent:
United States of America
Curtis v. DePuy Orthopaedics Inc et al
as 1:2016dp20091
Plaintiff:
Larry Curtis
Defendant:
DePuy Orthopaedics Inc , DePuy Inc. , DePuy International Limited and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Martin et al v. Combe Incorporated et al
as 3:2016cv00227
Plaintiff:
Demarco Martin , Ralph Weatherspoon , Albert Zachery and others
Defendant:
Combe Incorporated , Combe Products, Inc. , Combe Laboratories, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
