Cases 61 - 69 of 69
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2009cv00195
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Hill v. California Department of Corrections & Rehabilitation et al
as 1:2010cv00045
Plaintiff:
Shawna Hartmann and Caren Hill
Defendant:
Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation , California State Personnel Board , Division of Adult Institutions and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Lattimore v. Houston County Board of Commissioners
as 5:2008cv00027
Plaintiff:
Willie Dewayne Lattimore, Sr.
Defendant:
Houston County Board of Commissioners
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Justice v. Pope
as 07-2065
Plaintiff - Appellant:
THEODORE JUSTICE
Defendant - Appellee:
ART POPE, in his individual and official capacity, JACK S. HOLMES, in his individual and official capacity, NANCY WELLS, in her individual and official capacity and others
Feemster, Bridgette, et al v. BSA Ltd Prtnshp
as 07-7156
Plaintiff - Appellee:
Bridgette Feemster, Sabrina Lymore, Mary Brown and others
Defendant - Appellant:
BSA Limited Partnership
Justice v. Pope et al
as 5:2007cv00251
Plaintiff:
Theodore Justice
Defendant:
Art Pope, Jack S. Holmes, Nancy Wells and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Yvonne Thomas v. St. Louis Board of Police Comm, et al
as 07-2018
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Yvonne Thomas
Defendant - Appellee:
St. Louis Board of Police Commissioners, Michael J. Quinn, Bartholomew Saracino and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2007cv01057
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
STUKES v. KNOWLES et al
as 2:2007cv00198
Defendant:
DEBRA LEE, THE SYSTEM GROOVE, LARRY GRAHAM and others
Plaintiff:
BLAYNEY B. STUKES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
