Cases 1 - 10 of 16
Moore v. Laurel Police Department
as 23-60643
Plaintiff:
Gary Moore
Defendant:
Laurel Police Department
BOYCE V CORSANICO ET AL
as 2:2023cv00698
Plaintiff:
IN RE: JAY BOYCE and JAY ROMAIN BOYCE
Defendant:
DETECTIVE THOMAS CORSANICO and MOUNT LAUREL POLICE DEPARTMENT
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Pickens v. City of Laurel et al
as 2:2023cv00025
Plaintiff:
Deontae Pickens
Defendant:
City of Laurel, City of Laurel Police Department, Tommy Cox and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Moore v. Laurel Police Department
as 2:2022cv00001
Plaintiff:
Gary Moore
Defendant:
Laurel Police Department
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Smith v. Laurel Police Department et al
as 1:2021cv01557
Plaintiff:
Hero T. Smith and Tiera T. Smith
Defendant:
Laurel Police Department, Donald McGinty, Michael J. Wilson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2021cv00951
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
BELL-PARNELL v. MOUNT LAUREL POLICE DEPARTMENT et al
as 1:2020cv20000
Defendant:
SERGEANT RUTKOWSKI, LIEUTENANT JANE/JOHN DOE #1, DETECTIVE AMARO and others
Plaintiff:
CORTNEY BELL-PARNELL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Thomas et al v. The City of Laurel Mississippi et al
as 2:2019cv00112
Defendant:
Brian Hancock, The Laurel Police Department, Tommy Cox and others
Plaintiff:
Ereaon Smith and Mekail Thomas
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BOWMAN et al v. MOUNT LAUREL POLICE DEPARTMENT et al
as 1:2019cv05152
Plaintiff:
VANCE BOWMAN and SOL DIAZ
Defendant:
MOUNT LAUREL POLICE DEPARTMENT, OFFICER C MCELROY, TROOPER RINALDI BADGE NO. 7063 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Curbeam v. Officer Jeffrey A. Vancleave et al
as 8:2018cv02309
Plaintiff:
Rashawn Curbeam
Defendant:
City of Laurel, Maryland, Laurel Police Department and Officer Jeffrey A. Vancleave
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
