Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 1,721
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv06023
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Employment Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv03904
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1324 Aliens: Complaint for Forfeiture
Deafueh Monbo, et al v. Upper Chesapeake Medical Center, Inc., et al
as 24-7070
Plaintiff: Deafueh Monbo and Juahdi Monbo
Defendant: Upper Chesapeake Medical Center, Inc., Harford Memorial Hospital, Inc., Eskinder Afework, individually and as an employee of Upper Chesapeake Medical Center Inc. and others
Sarkar v. City of New York
as 24-1219
Plaintiff: JAY SARKAR
Defendant: CITY OF NEW YORK, THE SPECIAL COMMISSIONER OF INVESTIGATION FOR THE NEW YORK CITY SCHOOL DISTRICT, NEW YORK CITY DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION and others
US v. Laurence Sessum
as 24-6374
Plaintiff: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant: LAURENCE SESSUM
Deafueh Monbo v. Upper Chesapeake Medical Center, Inc.
as 24-1292
Plaintiff: DEAFUEH MONBO and JUAHDI MONBO
Defendant: UPPER CHESAPEAKE MEDICAL CENTER, INC., HARFORD MEMORIAL HOSPITAL, INC., ESKINDER AFEWORK, individually and as an employee of Upper Chesapeake Medical Center Inc. and others
Jackson v. Team Discovery LLC et al
as 2:2024cv00399
Plaintiff: Acasha Jackson
Defendant: Team Discovery LLC, Laurence Trimble and Trevor Trimble
Sessum v. USA
as 3:2024cv00340
Petitioner: Laurence Sessum
Respondent: USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
Hartley v. Blue Cross Blue Shield of North Carolina
as 1:2024cv00082
Plaintiff: Laurence Hartley
Defendant: Blue Cross Blue Shield of North Carolina
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
US v. Laurence Sessum
as 24-6259
Plaintiff: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant: LAURENCE SESSUM

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?