Cases 1 - 10 of 14
Christopher Wood et al v. 3M Company, The et al
as 2:2024cv00726
Defendant:
3M Company, The, DuPont de Nemours Inc, Minnesota Mining and Manufacturing Company and others
Plaintiff:
Christopher Wood and Laurie Wood
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Dontez Simuel v. Scott Harris
as 21-6097
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DONTEZ LAMONT SIMUEL
Defendant / Appellee:
MICHAEL DUGGAN, SCOTT S. HARRIS, Clerk of the U.S. Supreme Court and LAURIE WOOD
Bonvino et al v. Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals, Inc., incorrectly designated as Doe 1 et al
as 3:2020cv06948
Plaintiff:
Richard Bonvino, Raymond Hartley, Daniel Matheny and others
Defendant:
Grocery Outlet, Inc., Safeway Health, Inc., Kaiser Permanente International and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Wood v. Monsanto Company
as 3:2020cv00424
Plaintiff:
Laurie Wood
Defendant:
Monsanto Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Wood v. Monsanto Company
as 2:2020cv00028
Plaintiff:
Laurie Wood
Defendant:
Monsanto Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
REINER v. ROBERTS et al
as 1:2020cv00031
Defendant:
JOHN ROBERTS, CALIFORNIA STATE BAR, DOES 1 THROUGH 10 and others
Plaintiff:
MARTIN REINER
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
LaBrec, Matthew v. Springs, Fern et al
as 3:2019cv00804
Defendant:
Nurse Gibbons, H. Frank, Neaver Walters and others
Plaintiff:
Matthew LaBrec
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Simuel v. Harris et al
as 5:2019ct03267
Defendant:
Michael Duggan, Scott S. Harris and Laurie Wood
Plaintiff:
Dontez Lamont Simuel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
LaBrec, Matthew v. Weber, Lucas et al
as 3:2018cv01047
Defendant:
C/OII Scott, C/O Drennan, C/OII Conroy and others
Plaintiff:
Matthew LaBrec
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2014cv01265
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Sex)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
