Cases 1 - 10 of 13
LAWSTON v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 3:2021cv02272
Plaintiff:
COURTNEY LAWSTON
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2021cv02556
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Hardy-Graham v. Southampton Police Department et al
as 2:2020cv00981
Defendant:
Officer Kieth Lawston, Southampton Town Court, Jane Doe 2 and others
Plaintiff:
Andrew Hardy-Graham
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Lawston v. Commisioner of Social Security
as 3:2018cv02034
Plaintiff:
Douglas John Lawston
Defendant:
Commisioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 416
Carr v. McDonald
as 16-1804
Plaintiff - Appellant:
CHRISTINE CARR
Defendant - Appellee:
ROBERT A. MCDONALD, Secretary of Veterans Affairs
Defendant:
PAUL SEGIEN, Veterans Adminstration Patient Services, Manager, JOANNE PERRA, Acting CBO Manager, MR. VINCENT NG, Director and others
Milbury et al v. McDonald et al
as 1:2015cv11483
Plaintiff:
Christine Carr Milbury
Defendant:
Robert A. McDonald, Paul Segien, Joanne Perra and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Danyel Lawston v. USA
as 14-12720
Petitioner - Appellant:
DANYEL D. LAWSTON
Respondent - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Lawston v. United States of America
as 1:2014cv21396
Plaintiff:
Danyel D. Lawston
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Scott Jacobson v. Comcast Corporation
as 11-105
Petitioner:
SCOTT JACOBSON, SHABIR SADIK, HARRY GOSNELL and others
Respondent:
COMCAST CORPORATION, d/b/a Comcast Cable Communications Management, LLC, CONN-X, LLC, PROCOM SERVICES, LLC and others
Mathis v. Price et al
as 7:2010cv00447
Plaintiff:
Raymond Mathis
Defendant:
Cheryl Price, Miller, Lawston and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
