Cases 1 - 10 of 20
Carl BlackmonIn re: Carl Blackmon
as 23-14151
Petitioner:
In re: CARL LEE BLACKMON
Respondent:
ATTORNEY GENERAL, STATE OF FLORIDA
Carl Blackmon v. Secretary, Florida Department of Corrections
as 23-12429
Petitioner / Appellant:
CARL LEE BLACKMON
Respondent / Appellee:
SECRETARY, FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
BLACKMON v. DIXON
as 3:2023cv03190
Petitioner:
CARL LEE BLACKMON
Respondent:
RICKY DIXON and RICKY D DIXON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Carl Blackmon v. Secretary, Florida Department, et al
as 20-13173
Petitioner / Appellant:
CARL LEE BLACKMON
Respondent / Appellee:
SECRETARY, FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS and ATTORNEY GENERAL, STATE OF FLORIDA
BLACKMON v. SECRETARY OF FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS et al
as 3:2020cv05454
Respondent:
SECRETARY OF FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS and ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA
Petitioner:
CARL LEE BLACKMON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Baca et al v. Sabine River Authority
as 3:2017cv00253
Plaintiff:
Erica Jill Baca, Marko Baca, Arlis Barrow and others
Defendant:
Sabine River Authority, State of Louisiana
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Fetherson v. Blackmon et al
as 0:2016cv03189
Plaintiff:
Dana Fetherson
Defendant:
Monty Lee Blackmon, Lancaster County Sheriff Office and Lancaster, County of
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BLACKMON v. SECRETARY OF FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
as 3:2015cv00433
Petitioner:
CARL LEE BLACKMON
Respondent:
SECRETARY OF FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Eddie Blackmon v. Willie Anderson, et al
as 14-60332
Plaintiff - Appellant:
EDDIE LEE BLACKMON
Defendant - Appellee:
WILLIE ANDERSON, Investigator, BILLY PATRICK, Investigator, OFFICER MICHAEL HOLFIELD and others
Blackmon v. C. R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2014cv06167
Plaintiff:
Robin Lee Blackmon
Defendant:
C. R. Bard, Inc. and Tissue Science Laboratories Limited
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
