Cases 1 - 10 of 20
Starr v. Moody et al
as 2:2023cv00129
Plaintiff:
David Lee Starr
Defendant:
Moody, Gary R Kerstein, Gragoey Rachigl and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ramirez et al v. Dubois Tree Service, LLC et al
as 1:2022cv02295
Plaintiff:
Ralph Ramirez and Jose Luis Mendez
Defendant:
Dubois Tree Service, LLC and Ronald Lee Starr
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Starr v. Butler et al (INMATE 2)
as 2:2020cv00641
Defendant:
Jefferson S. Dunn, Kay Ivey and Reosha Butler
Plaintiff:
Timothy Lee Starr
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Serratt v. Butler et al (INMATE 1)
as 2:2020cv00625
Plaintiff:
Bobby Gene Smith, Jr., Jonathan Yancy, Roy Murphy Rutledge and others
Defendant:
Warden Butler, Kay Ivey, Jefferson S. Dunn and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Starr v. Price
as 5:2020cv02243
Petitioner:
Shannon Lee Starr
Respondent:
Brandon Price
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Shannon Starr v. Gregory Ahern
as 17-70828
Petitioner:
SHANNON LEE STARR
Respondent:
GREGORY J. AHERN
Starr v. Highland Hospital et al
as 3:2016cv07168
Plaintiff:
Shannon Lee Starr
Defendant:
Highland Hospital, Alameda County Sheriff's Office, Corizon Health Inc and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Starr v. Oakland Police Department, et al
as 5:2015cv00806
Plaintiff:
Shannon Lee Starr
Defendant:
Oakland Police Department, et al
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
David Starr v. E. Holloman, et al
as 15-1318
Plaintiff - Appellant:
David Lee Starr
Defendant - Appellee:
E. Holloman, Ex. Sgt. Maximum Security Unit, Arkansas Department of Correction, P. King, CO-1, Maximum Security Unit, Arkansas Department of Correction, Randy Morgan, Warden, Maximum Security Unit, Arkansas Department of Correction and others
Starr v. Ahern et al
as 5:2014cv02170
Plaintiff:
Shannon Lee Starr
Defendant:
Gregory J. Ahern, D. Freligh, O. Reyes and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
