Cases 1 - 10 of 120
Kayla Heidelberg v. City of Peoria, Illinois, et al
as 24-1706
Plaintiff:
KAYLA HEIDELBERG, Administrator of the Estate of Cleve Heidelberg, Jr.
Defendant:
CITY OF PEORIA, ILLINOIS, LARRY BERNARD, EMANUEL MANIAS and others
Watson-Buisson v. Dotson
as 1:2024cv00603
Petitioner:
Jeremy Lee Watson-Buisson and Jeremy Leigh Watson-Buisson
Respondent:
Chadwick Dotson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Watson v. United States of America
as 4:2021cv00328
Petitioner:
Justin Lee Watson
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Jackson v. Lay et al
as 2:2021cv00129
Plaintiff:
Andrew Jackson and Arkansas Board of Correction
Defendant:
Gaylon Lay, Michael Richardson, Dexter Payne and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
John Foley v. John Felts, et al
as 21-2889
Plaintiff / Appellant:
John D. Foley
Defendant / Appellee:
John Felts, Chairman, Arkansas Parole Board, Benny Mangess, Member of Parole Board, Individual and Official Capacity, Bobby Glover, Member of Parole Board, Individual and Official Capacity and others
Foley v. Felts et al
as 4:2021cv00716
Plaintiff:
John D Foley
Defendant:
John Felts, Benny Mangess, Bobby Glover and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jeremy Watson-Buisson v. Department of Corrections
as 21-7117
Petitioner / Appellant:
JEREMY LEE WATSON-BUISSON
Respondent / Appellee:
DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
Watson v. United States of America
as 4:2021cv00193
Petitioner:
Justin Lee Watson
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Curtis Watson v. Veterans Hospital Medical Sta
as 21-5101
Defendant / Appellee:
Veterans Hospital Medical Staff
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Curtis Lee Watson
Watson, Larry v. Saul, Andrew
as 3:2021cv00120
Defendant:
Andrew Saul
Plaintiff:
Larry Lee Watson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
