Cases 1 - 10 of 100
MALONE v. AGBOASI
as 5:2026cv00325
Petitioner:
STANLEY LENARD MALONE
Respondent:
MARK AGBOASI
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Philip Steele v. Mason Ayer
as 26-6832
Plaintiff:
PHILIP SCOTT STEELE
Defendant:
MASON AYER, SERGEANT ZACHARY LEONARD and BRIAN LENARD
Wilkins v. USA
as 6:2026cv00237
Petitioner:
Gabriel Lenard Wilkins
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2026cv00238
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Civil Miscellaneous Case
Grimes v. City of San Francisco et al
as 3:2026cv05626
Plaintiff:
Jerome Lenard Grimes
Defendant:
City of San Francisco and State of California
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Boncompagni v. Village of Elm Grove et al
as 2:2026cv01027
Plaintiff:
Natasha FS Boncompagni
Defendant:
Village of Elm Grove, Officer Samuel Fisher, Officer Hannah Martin and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
USA v. Carlton Adams
as 26-11965
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant:
CARLTON LENARD ADAMS
(PC) Grimes v. City of San Francisco et al
as 2:2026cv01932
Plaintiff:
Jerome Lenard Grimes
Defendant:
City of San Francisco and State of California
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Arcell, et al. v. United States District Court for the Northern District of California, San Francisco
as 26-2642
Petitioner:
MARY KATHERINE ARCELL, KEITH DEAN BRADT, JOSE BRITO and others
Respondent:
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO
Real Party In Interest:
GOOGLE LLC and APPLE INC.
Freeland, et al. v. Nippon Steel Corporation, et al.
as 26-2522
Plaintiff:
JAN MARIE BROWN, ROSEMARY D'AUGUSTA, PAMELA FAUST and others
Defendant:
NIPPON STEEL CORPORATION, NIPPON STEEL NORTH AMERICA, INC. and UNITED STATES STEEL CORPORATION
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
