Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Ronald Gaines v. Wayne County, MI, et al
as 23-1075
Plaintiff / Appellant:
RONALD GAINES
Defendant / Appellee:
WAYNE COUNTY, MI, SERGEANT LEONARD DAVIS, SERGEANT STEVEN HUNTER and others
Ronald Gaines v. Wayne County, MI, et al
as 22-2150
Plaintiff / Appellant:
RONALD GAINES
Defendant / Appellee:
WAYNE COUNTY, MI, SERGEANT LEONARD DAVIS, SERGEANT STEVEN HUNTER and others
Gaines v. County of Wayne et al
as 2:2020cv11186
Defendant:
Sergeant Leonard Davis, Wellpath LLC, f/k/a Correct Care Solutions, LLC, Shanique Maddox and others
Plaintiff:
Ronald Gaines
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2019cv03799
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Santoyo v. Bexar Cty
as 19-50124
Defendant / Appellee:
DANIEL BIBLE, United States Immigration and Enforcement, KIRSTJEN M. NIELSEN, SECRETARY, U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY, ENRIQUE M. LUCERO, Field Office Director for the San Antonio Field Office and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JULIO TRUJILLO SANTOYO
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2018cv01592
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Julio Santoyo v. Bexar County, Texas, et al
as 17-51005
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JULIO TRUJILLO SANTOYO
Defendant - Appellee:
BEXAR COUNTY, TEXAS, ENRIQUE M. LUCERO, Field Office Director for the San Antonio Field Office, JOHN DOE 1-5, Employees of Immigration and Customs Enforcement and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2012cv00041
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Addington Stewart, et al v. City of St. Louis
as 07-2548
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Addington Stewart, Michael Richardson, Leonard Davis and others
Defendant - Appellee:
City of St. Louis
Intervenor:
Paul E. Davis, Gary Steffens, Gail Simmons and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
