Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Tlatoani Teotl Tenamaxtle Trust ETO v. Shiela Polk, et al
as 23-55477
Plaintiff / Appellant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, EX REL. TLATOANI-TEOTL TENAMAXTLE, TRUST ETO, Tenamxtle, Tlatoani-Teotl, beneficary
Defendant / Appellee:
SHIELA S. POLK, Yavapai County Attorney, STATE OF ARIZONA, Office of the Attorney General, DAVID RHODES, Sheriff and others
Mcloughlin et al v. Cantor Fitzgerald, L.P. et al
as 1:2023cv00256
Plaintiff:
Mcloughlin Shawn, Miller Robert, Sofocleus Angelo and others
Defendant:
Cantor Fitzgerald, L.P., BGC Holdings, L.P. and Newmark Holdings, L.P.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1337 Sherman-Clayton Act
In re: In the Matter of Modern American Railroad Services, LLC et al
as 2:2021cv00464
Not Classified By Court:
Montrell Smith, Lewis Andrews, Fieldwood Energy Offshore LLC and others
Petitioner:
Modern American Railroad Services, LLC and Shore Offshore Services, LLC
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 30504
Andrews et al v. Fieldwood Energy Offshore, Inc. et al
as 4:2020cv04009
Plaintiff:
Lewis Andrews and Burnett Patrick
Defendant:
Fieldwood Energy Offshore, Inc., Fieldwood Energy LLC, Shore Offshore Services LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446
Evans v. Maricopa County Towers Jail et al
as 2:2020cv00671
Plaintiff:
Lewis Andrew Evans, V
Defendant:
Paul Penzone, Maricopa County Towers Jail and Unknown Party
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Evans v. Penzone et al
as 2:2020cv00357
Plaintiff:
Lewis Andrew Evans, V
Defendant:
Paul Penzone, Unknown Party, Jerry Williams and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
USA v. Melvin Andrew
as 17-11371
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
MELVIN LEWIS ANDREWS
US v. Raymond Andrews
as 08-4721
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
RAYMOND LEWIS ANDREWS
Lewis Andrew Clark, et al. v. Alabany International Corp., et al.
as NCE/2:04-CV-00042
Plaintiff:
Lewis Andrew Clark
Defendant:
Alabany International Corp
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
