Cases 1 - 10 of 100
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2026cv04643
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 26-3129
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Derek Hargrove, Jr. v. Toyota Motor Credit Corp
as 26-1945
Plaintiff:
DEREK TYRONE HARGROVE, JR.
Defendant:
TOYOTA MOTOR CREDIT CORP, DBA Lexus Financial Services
Raffie Kotikian v. Lexus of Glendale et al
as 2:2026cv04217
Plaintiff:
Raffie Kotikian
Defendant:
Lexus of Glendale, KDW Automotive, Inc., Lexus Financial Services, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal - Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2026cv00367
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Avedisian v. Gulf Management Inc.
as 8:2026cv00998
Plaintiff:
Virginia Avedisian
Defendant:
Gulf Management Inc. doing business as Lexus of Clearwater
Pretrial Service:
Gregory P. Holder
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2026cv01925
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 The Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990
Morales v. City of Homestead et al
as 1:2026cv21881
Plaintiff:
Arturo Morales
Defendant:
City of Homestead, (# 10-0650) Det. Mata and Lexus Guerrero
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2026cv02891
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal - Fair Credit Reporti
Avedisian v. Gulf Management, Inc.
as 9:2026cv80220
Plaintiff:
Virginia Avedisian
Defendant:
Gulf Management, Inc. doing business as Lexus of Clearwater
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.