Cases 1 - 9 of 9
In Re: Liberty Counsel, Inc.
as 23-1200
Petitioner:
Liberty Counsel, Inc. and Rena M. Lindevaldsen, Individually and as Alleged Agent of Liberty Counsel, Inc.
Respondent:
Janet Jenkins, for herself and as next friend of Isabella Miller-Jenkins, a/k/a Isabella Miller by next friend
Jenkins v. Miller et al
as 6:2018cv00078
Plaintiff:
Janet Jenkins
Defendant:
Kenneth L. Miller, Mathew D. Staver, Timothy D. Miller and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
In Re: Liberty Counsel, Inc.
as 18-876
Petitioner:
Liberty Counsel, Inc. and Rena M. Lindevaldsen, Individually and as Alleged Agent of Liberty Counsel, Inc.
Respondent:
Janet Jenkins, for herself and as next friend of Isabella Miller-Jenkins, a/k/a Isabella Miller by next friend and Isabella Miller-Jenkins
Liberty Counsel, Inc. v. Guidestar USA, Inc.
as 4:2017cv00071
Plaintiff:
Liberty Counsel, Inc.
Defendant:
Guidestar USA, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125
Liberty Counsel, Inc. v. City of Lawrence
as 1:2015cv12862
Plaintiff:
Liberty Counsel, Inc.
Defendant:
City of Lawrence
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Liberty Counsel, Inc. v. County of Wake, North Carolina
as 5:2015cv00176
Plaintiff:
Liberty Counsel, Inc.
Defendant:
County of Wake, North Carolina
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Liberty Counsel, Inc. v. Village of Plainfield, Illinois
as 1:2012cv09485
Defendant:
Village of Plainfield, Illinois
Plaintiff:
Liberty Counsel, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Liberty Counsel, Inc. v. City of Seaside
as 3:2012cv00329
Defendant:
City of Seaside, Seaside Library Board and Seaside Public Library Board of Trustees
Plaintiff:
Liberty Counsel, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Liberty Counsel, Inc. v. Ohio Liberty Council Corp.
as 2:2011cv00789
Plaintiff:
Liberty Counsel, Inc.
Defendant:
Ohio Liberty Council Corp.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 44
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
