Cases 31 - 40 of 44
IN RE: FAILURE TO COMPLY WITH CLE REQUIREMENTS . . .
as 1:2015mc00049
In Re:
FAILURE TO COMPLY WITH CONTINUING LEGAL EDUCATION REQUIREMENTS, NONPAYMENT OF ATTORNEY REGISTRATION FEES, AND/OR FAILURE TO SUBMIT IOLTA CERTIFICATION
Respondent:
MICHELE RENE IGNEY, GARY LEE ROYER, HOLLY DEMAREST WARSHAUER and others
Harris v. DePuy Orthopaedics, Inc. et al
as 1:2014dp20595
Plaintiff:
Lisa Harris
Defendant:
DePuy Orthopaedics, Inc. , DePuy, Inc. , DePuy International Limited and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Priscilla Erve v. Henry Ford Community College, et al
as 14-2323
Plaintiff - Appellant:
PRISCILLA ERVE
Defendant - Appellee:
HENRY FORD COMMUNITY COLLEGE, GAIL MEE, MAJORIE SWAN and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2014cv00103
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Harris-Smith et al v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 2:2013cv31329
Plaintiff:
Lisa Harris-Smith and Mike Smith
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc., Ethicon, LLC and Johnson & Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Erve v. Henry Ford Community College et al
as 2:2013cv12608
Plaintiff:
Priscilla Erve
Defendant:
Henry Ford Community College, Gail Mee, Majorie Swan and others
Hruby v. Godinez et al
as 3:2013cv00228
Plaintiff:
Andrew C Hruby
Defendant:
S.A. Godinez, Marc Hodge, Storm and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Austin v. S.A. Godinez et al
as 3:2013cv00084
Plaintiff:
Allan K Austin
Defendant:
S.A. Godinez, Marc Hodge, Storm and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
USA v. Lisa Harri
as 12-13139
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
LISA HARRIS
Thomas v. Daniel et al
as 3:2012cv00101
Plaintiff:
Devandal Thomas
Defendant:
Williams E Daniel, Michael A Teston, Robert D. Hancock and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
