Cases 1 - 10 of 13
Hicks, Lisa v. Saul, Andrew
as 3:2020cv00333
Plaintiff:
Lisa Hicks
Defendant:
Andrew M. Saul
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 402
Hicks et al v. Janssen Research & Development, LLC et al
as 2:2016cv03498
Plaintiff:
Lisa Hicks and Billy Hicks
Defendant:
Janssen Ortho, LLC, Johnson & Johnson Company, Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Colello v. Janssen Research & Development LLC et al
as 2:2016cv01615
Plaintiff:
Dorothy F Colello , Brenda Harper , Finers B Cryer, II and others
Defendant:
Janssen Ortho, LLC, Johnson & Johnson Company, Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Hephzibah Bates v. Lisa Thoma
as 15-1611
Plaintiff - Appellant:
HEPHZIBAH BATES, a/k/a Hattie Tea Jenkins Bates
Defendant - Appellee:
LISA HICKS THOMAS
Hicks v. Pfizer Inc
as 2:2015cv00150
Plaintiff:
Lisa Hicks
Defendant:
Pfizer Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Bates v. Thomas
as 3:2014cv00164
Plaintiff:
Hephzibah Bates
Defendant:
Lisa Hicks Thomas
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Corey Coles v. Ralph Northcutt and Spouse
as 14-6006
Plaintiff - Appellant:
COREY COLES
Defendant - Appellee:
RALPH NORTHCUTT, Supervisor/Teacher, HAROLD CLARKE, Director of Virginia Department of Corrections, G. ROBINSON, Manager Ombudsman Service Unit and others
Coles v. Ralph Northcutt et al., and Spouse et al
as 2:2012cv00630
Plaintiff:
Corey Coles
Defendant:
Ralph Northcutt et al., and Spouse, Harold Clarke and Spouse, G. Robinson and Spouse and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2011cv14260
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Lisa Hicks v. Avery Drei, LLC, et al
as 10-2744
Plaintiff - Appellant:
LISA HICKS
Defendant - Appellee:
AVERY DREI, LLC and CHANCE FELLING
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
